The second half/ethics piece was interesting and somewhat useful. The first half/technical half was difficult to follow. There were a few useful pieces of information that I was able to pick up during the presentation, but in my opinion the presentation suffered from an attempt to present too much information without really explaining much of it in a useable way. In my opinion it would have been better to have selected about 1/2 of the information based on likelihood of use, and give enough information on those items to allow them to be implemented. Also, the visual presentation was not functional. The power point was about 2/3 of the screen, and was too small to see, as well as suffering from glare to the point that what could be seen was not legible. We had no need to have the presenter on the other 1/3 of the screen, but would have benefited from being able to see her power point.