Describe the aspects of your itinerary that you thought worked really well.
Beautiful ship, kind, professional staff, decent food.
Describe the aspects of your itinerary that you thought needs improving
I thought the land excursions were kinda pointless. It seems the purpose was to just to walk a few feet on land. Unlike the landing trips in Antarctica where the purpose was to see the wild life or to hike to a vantage point or to visit a working research station etc. Also, on this trip the lectures were mostly done by expedition guides while in Antarctica the lecturers were experts in their respective fields (climatologist, historian, ornithologist, marine biologist etc).
Were you satisfied with the efforts taken to minimize environmental impacts during your trip?