Equality, Diversity & Inclusion Training Reviews

4.4 Rating 2,633 Reviews

About High Speed Training:

We provide high-quality, certified training courses to help your business comply with legislation and ensure your employees are up-to-date with relevant training.

We have over 160 courses in a range of subject areas, including Food Hygiene, Health and Safety, Professional Skills, Health and Nutrition and Safeguarding People. Our range of courses is continually expanding so keep checking back for updates!

Visit Product Page

Phone:

0333 006 7000

Email:

reviews@highspeedtraining.co.uk

Location:

High Speed Training Limited, Riverside Business Park, Dansk Way,
High Speed Training Limited, Riverside Business Park, Dansk Way
Ilkley
LS29 8JZ

Visit Product Page

Justin Harris

Verified Reviewer

“Thanks.”

Helpful Report

Posted 2 years ago

Hi Justin Thank you so much for your review and kind word! I was just wondering if you are happy to possibly revise your star rating as 3 Stars, or less, is considered a "Negative Review" and can affect how other customers view our training. To do this, please refer back to the "Congratulations" e-mail that you received when you finished the training. If you re-review the course it will change your star rating. If you'd like any other information, please feel free to contact me directly on 0333 006 7000 or support@highspeedtraining.co.uk. We're here Monday through Friday, 9am - 5pm. Many thanks in advance and have a lovely day. Karen

Posted 2 years ago

Shireen Razey

Verified Reviewer

“A very good course.”

Helpful Report

Posted 2 years ago

Lyam Kneller

Verified Reviewer

“.”

Helpful Report

Posted 2 years ago

Jamie Wheeldon

Verified Reviewer

“Course content was good, but it was delivered very slowly. Even with the settings set to fast I found it very painful waiting so long before I was allowed to advance.”

Helpful Report

Posted 2 years ago

Morning Jamie, Thank you for your review on our Equality, Diversity & Inclusion Training I am sorry to hear you felt the course was too slow even on the fastest setting. I am sure you can appreciate the responsibility we have as a training provider to ensure our users are taking the time to read and understand the information in front of them. I do however appreciate some people absorb information faster than others. I have passed your feedback onto the relevant teams to see if there is anything we can do for future users. If you need anything else, please don't hesitate to contact me directly. Kindest Regards! Vicky (Customer Support, High Speed Training)

Posted 2 years ago

“Straightforward and clear.”

Helpful Report

Posted 2 years ago

Winnie Obiesie

Verified Reviewer

“Not bad overall, some areas were basic and some were not, but i would recommend.”

Helpful Report

Posted 2 years ago

Hello Winnie Thank you for your review and feedback, we appreciate it. We really value the opinions of our customers so I've passed your comments onto the appropriate team to see if there is something we can do for future versions of the course. Thank you for your recommendation though we really appreciate it, and we wish you all the best in the future. Kind regards, (Customer Support, High Speed Training).

Posted 2 years ago

Richard Bass

Verified Reviewer

“Giving 'incorrect' for 'reporting someone to HR' when they're being sexist/ableist/racist etc is a bit of a confusing one for me - Yes ideally it would be nice if I could say 'oh hi, you're being racist to that person, please stop' and I would hope to always do that, but you expect people to do this every time as a hard rule? Imagine me saying that to someone physically intimidating or who might seek to fight back? The role of HR is to handle these things, and yes supporting and showing solidarity is also a correct answer, it isn't always suitable, whereas it is always suitable to tell HR that someone was being racist/ableist/sexist etc at work and you would do that alongside speaking against the person usually, no? Your question said 1 answer so I went with HR as I felt it was always right to do so. Knowing there are 9 protected characteristics just felt like an extra question was needed to 'round it up' - there might be more added in future, so I don't feel knowing it is 9 helps. Just feeding this one back as while I didn't get it wrong, being asked seemed a bit like it was a filler. The 'what genders are protected by [act]' one confused me slightly because the options were male and female only, those + non binary, all genders, and another answer I can't recall. In the learning you had mentioned that there was an act that only protected male and female as it stands but that legally speaking there was a way it was being adapted to incorporate more people. So I am left with wondering, even on review, whether the correct answer should have been what I'd personally prefer - ie 'all genders' as a catch all. Or whether the correct answer was male and female only, which is where the current law is failing people but as stated in the learning, this is being challenged somewhat successfully. I picked male, female and non-binary thinking that was the closest to incorporating the challenges made to the laws. But this was not the correct answer. Overall great, I just felt the 'number' one wasn't really in the spirit of the training. The HR one confused me because most businesses would prefer to have their HR team handle things than have their staff be judge and jury on a situation, and the law in the gender question is under challenge so I was at a loss for where the answer should be. Hope this makes sense! Sorry for the long winded reply!”

Helpful Report

Posted 2 years ago

Pia Schmoeckel

Verified Reviewer

“Learned a lot :)”

Helpful Report

Posted 2 years ago