“This is an excellent cone of the original, which I won’t name. The bottle is an unbelievable reproduction, and could pass for the real thing! But it costs 10% of the genuine. Very, very similar fragrance, (assuming you like oud , it’s very different to my usual aftershave.- check first). This one lasts quite a few hours, but probably hasn’t got the projection of the original. But for 90% cheaper I’ll manage. I’m sure it’s best in winter, could be too strong in summer or in an office.”
“I'd watched a load of videos on Youtube about OFGlory before buying it, and so many were gushing with praise about it being just a tiny step down the scale from the original OFGreatness. While I agree it is good, it has a definite one-dimensional quality about it that OFGreatness beats, hands-down. OFGreatness' dry-down develops into a semi-sweet, luxurious scent, and its longevity is far better. OFGlory seems to stick to its initial opening for a few hours, then becomes a skin scent that's just a faint version of the opening for the remainder. They both seem to last about the same on textiles though. In fairness, given that it's almost 1/10th the price, OFGlory is still a beaut of a fragrance, regardless. ...and as shameless a rip-off of the original that bottle and label are ;) , the presentation (again, for the price) is fantastic. The vaporiser could be better though, providing just a light PFF.”
“I'd watched a load of videos on Youtube about OFGlory before buying it, and so many were gushing with praise about it being just a tiny step down the scale from the original OFGreatness. While I agree it is good, it has a definite one-dimensional quality about it that OFGreatness beats, hands-down. OFGreatness' dry-down develops into a semi-sweet, luxurious scent, and its longevity is far better. OFGlory seems to stick to its initial opening for a few hours, then becomes a skin scent that's just a faint version of the opening for the remainder. They both seem to last about the same on textiles though. In fairness, given that it's almost 1/10th the price, OFGlory is still a beaut of a fragrance, regardless. ...and as shameless a rip-off of the original that bottle and label are ;) , the presentation (again, for the price) is fantastic. The vaporiser could be better though, providing just a light PFF.”
“I'd watched a load of videos on Youtube about OFGlory before buying it, and so many were gushing with praise about it being just a tiny step down the scale from the original OFGreatness. While I agree it is good, it has a definite one-dimensional quality about it that OFGreatness beats, hands-down. OFGreatness' dry-down develops into a semi-sweet, luxurious scent, and its longevity is far better. OFGlory seems to stick to its initial opening for a few hours, then becomes a skin scent that's just a faint version of the opening for the remainder. They both seem to last about the same on textiles though. In fairness, given that it's almost 1/10th the price, OFGlory is still a beaut of a fragrance, regardless. ...and as shameless a rip-off of the original that bottle and label are ;) , the presentation (again, for the price) is fantastic. The vaporiser could be better though, providing just a light PFF.”
“I'd watched a load of videos on Youtube about OFGlory before buying it, and so many were gushing with praise about it being just a tiny step down the scale from the original OFGreatness. While I agree it is good, it has a definite one-dimensional quality about it that OFGreatness beats, hands-down. OFGreatness' dry-down develops into a semi-sweet, luxurious scent, and its longevity is far better. OFGlory seems to stick to its initial opening for a few hours, then becomes a skin scent that's just a faint version of the opening for the remainder. They both seem to last about the same on textiles though. In fairness, given that it's almost 1/10th the price, OFGlory is still a beaut of a fragrance, regardless. ...and as shameless a rip-off of the original that bottle and label are ;) , the presentation (again, for the price) is fantastic. The vaporiser could be better though, providing just a light PFF.”
