Login
Start Free Trial Are you a business? Click Here

Pro 100 EXP Reviews

4.8 Rating 87 Reviews
Chris S
Verified Reviewer
Incentivized
Hands down, without a doubt, the single best piece of equipment I have in my basement gym. This single set takes the place of every dumbell available in a commercial gym from 5-100lb... (5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, 15, 17.5... seriously, 38 weight combinations!!!) For a home/basement/garage gym the Pro100 EXP is the ultimate space saver, but it doesn't do it cheaply, these are very well constructed & durable. I researched every modular dumbell on the market and am glad I finally pulled the trigger on the Power Blocks. I'd rate them 10 stars, but I'm only allowed five. Worth every penny. Pick some up for your gym, you won't be disappointed.
Helpful Report
Posted 4 days ago
Very solid. Nice to save space. Does everything it needs to do and considerably cheaper.
Helpful Report
Posted 2 weeks ago
I love this set. I wish there would have been an option to choose a different handle size. I would have went with the 32mm. Now I have to order separately.
1 Helpful Report
Posted 2 weeks ago
Great set of dumbbells. However, the handle is too thick. There should have been option to order the dumbbells with a thicker or thinner handle.
1 Helpful Report
Posted 1 month ago
Best purchase I've ever made for my home gym. Worth every penny!
1 Helpful Report
Posted 1 month ago
These dumbbells are easy to use and ideal for small spaces, making them a great choice for anyone with limited room for equipment. The square shape is a unique feature that may take some getting used to. It can feel slightly awkward at certain angles, especially during exercises that require a neutral grip. However, the space-saving design and overall functionality make them a solid addition to a home gym.
2 Helpful Report
Posted 3 months ago
Great product. They are durable and easy to use.
Helpful Report
Posted 3 months ago
Should have started with these years ago, cost was concerning, however worth every dollar when compared to what I was using prior.
1 Helpful Report
Posted 4 months ago