“Attended a Comptia A+ (acelerated) organised by my employer - The room was too small -and we were cramped on a table with hardly any room to write notes as there was little space between myself and the next guy. The laptops were never user and no lab work was undertaken as promised prior by my employer and GK.The week was spent just sat round the table while the trainer did his best to skim through a huge book on 901 - We hit mid week and 902 was rushed.The trainer tried his best to show things off his laptop onto the display -but those further away including myself could hardly see anything on the display -The trainer seemed to know his stuff but was under that must time pressure had to rush through everything I came away no wiser having had no time to consolidate or do any of the lab work etc -If it was about readin a book I could have done it at home or on the web. And to add insult to injury my employer has told me i need to sit the exam within 2 weeks - THIS IS BULLYING and any training division should advise cooperations to not book exams for trainees in this manner Dissapointed”
“As usual Tony engages the audience very well. Using new technology that we were piloting was also incorporated well into the session. We got excellent feedback with 100% agreeing they would recommend to a friend!”
“made it easy to book and find the right course. keen to do another course next year to build on skills so hope to come back to Global Knowledge again.”
“The scope of he training was not clear. The audience needed other kind of training, more focused in architecture, Vodafone solution...rather than configuring the system.”
“The course I attended was out of date and many of the labs didn't work. The web connection was very slow for the first 3 days which made the whole thing even more painful. The trainer was good but I felt him having to deal will the many issues we had.
Even the questionnaire at the end didn't work!”
“Good trainer, content adequate to pass the certification exam.
Training material to be improved: pdf print was done with a poor quality, slides were not readable in some case. A couple of slides were apparently wrong, there was a mismatch with the comments. One slide was from another course.”
