“I am an experienced WC attorney, I only attended because I was behind on my CLE hours and this was right down the street from my office. I still learned a good deal though from the presenters Mr. Samuels Mr. Safran.”
“There were only 9 people in the audience, lunch should have been offered. There were no restaurants nearby.
Presenters were excellent, content good, able to ask questions, room comfortable (a bit cold)”
“Nice, comfortable venue, professional materials and well organized.
I would have liked better signage as to where the event was located inside the hotel. Very confusing to find it and electronic boards were not helpful.”
“1) I wish there was an NBI phone app, so I could listen to/watch a lecture when I'm on a long drive.
2) Some lecturers tend to be a bit boring, but others are better.”
“The faculty and material were excellent for any attorney who practices in this area. The attorneys were very knowledgeable and energetic which made for a great CLE.”
“Heffner, James and Simpson were EXCELLENT for what they were asked to teach.
Others were good. Class small. Facility excellent.
Book very informative with industry comparisons.”
“I couldn't attend the seminar and thus, ordered the material. 201 pages of extraordinarily good material and your making it possible for me to have it immediately was fantastic. THANK YOU.”
“I could not make the font large enough to see easily on my laptop. The screen showed both the speaker and his screen with text. Would like the ability to make the text larger so I could listen, read the text and make notes.”
“Handouts were not prepared for the state that the presentation was being conducted. Arizona Law was presented to California. Most presenters had no handout and promised to make PowerPoint available yet have not. this made it difficult to follow along and or participate meaningfully. It appeared to be thrown together at the last minute and materials from other presentations substituted. This was not the professional presentation I expected.”
