PaperTrue Reviews

4.6 Rating 2,377 Reviews
94 %
of reviewers recommend PaperTrue
4.6
Based on 2,377 reviews
Shipping & Delivery
Delivery Methods
Courier, Postal Service
Average Delivery Time
Next Day
On-time Delivery
Greater than 93%
Accurate And Undamaged Orders
Greater than 92%
Customer Service
Communication Channels
Email, Live Chat, Telephone
Queries Resolved In
Under An Hour
Customer Service
4.6 out of 5
Read PaperTrue Reviews

About PaperTrue:

At PaperTrue, we love bringing out the full impact of your writing. This is because we know that words hold the key to communication, and so to success. Your ideas deserve the best possible expression, and our editing and proofreading services are here to help you harness the power of language.

Visit Website

Phone:

+1-888-527-3085

Email:

support@papertrue.com

I’ve sent a lot with you guys and I can say that the quality is sub par. There has been one edition so far who did a very nice job really going thru my document and offering suggestions that actually made the paper better. The others I’ve found errors missed. APA 7 formatting mistakes missed. I once even made the line margines wrong on a quote > 40 words just to see if it would be caught and it was not. I will be switching to another platform next semester as I’ve spent $700 on papers with you all and the quality has just not been where I’d hope for the $. I send to a decís editor after you and the feedback is always the same “the people who checked this must have been in a hurry”. If I could pick the same editor alwys I would stay but even that last request was never fulfilled.
Helpful Report
Posted 1 year ago
Hi Troy! Thank you for your honest review. We're sorry to hear that our services did not meet your expectations, and would like to offer you a free revision for your paper. Please let us know if we can help you further. Best, Team PaperTrue
Posted 1 year ago
I go the same work I submitted, little to no changes was done to my paper.
Helpful Report
Posted 4 years ago
The proofreader "overcorrected" at several instances, but worse the proofreader didn't understand the meaning of the content in several cases.
Helpful Report
Posted 4 years ago
Hey there! We have tried to get in touch with you but couldn't. Can you please describe your issue in detail and send an email to support@papertrue.com so we can revise your document? We are confident that the meaning of the sentences was retained and the editor was only giving possible suggestions which were up to you to implement. Thanks, The PaperTrue Team
Posted 4 years ago
Simple grammar checks.
Helpful Report
Posted 4 years ago
Hey there, Hope you're doing great! We see in your document that out of 2700 words, around 900 words were edited. That amount to almost 33% of the document changed. There were significant improvements in the language, formatting and presentation - not just grammar checks. We ran several human based and bot checks but couldnt find any errors. We tried getting in touch with you but also failed so we assume that you ultimately were able to find value in the editing. Thanks and Best Regards, The PaperTrue Team
Posted 4 years ago
after a childish report, I had a phone call from someone whose English was so bad I couldn't understand them.
Helpful Report
Posted 4 years ago
Hi John, Can you please eloborate what you mean by "childish"? If you can render more details regarding your issue we could quickly resolve them. We see in your document that out of 4500 words, around 900 words were edited. That amount to almost 20% of the document changed. There were significant improvements in the language, formatting and presentation. We ran several human based and bot checks but couldnt find any errors. We tried getting in touch with you but also failed so we assume that you ended up having all your issues resolved. Thanks and Best Regards, The PaperTrue Team
Posted 4 years ago
The problem is that scientific manuscripts are not always assigned to editors used to scientific language. It is the second time in a row that the review is unstisfactory to me. For the rest, both pricing and turnaround time are excellent, but this is not enough if the review is not good.
Helpful Report
Posted 4 years ago
Hi Rocco, We will have the document edited again by an expert in the science domain. I hope that will resolve your issue. We will also be happy to refund the amount for your last order. Thanks, The PaperTrue Team
Posted 4 years ago
It was not what expected I was hoping to improve the flow of my document, most review are stuff that they do not understand because is a Food Science document
Helpful Report
Posted 4 years ago
Hi there! Can you tell us what you expected so that we revise the document and deliver it to you? We see that significant changes were made language, formatting, consistency and referencing. If there is anything else you were looking for, kindly send us an email to support@papertrue.com Thanks, The PaperTrue Team
Posted 4 years ago
My experience was not satisfactory. After submitting my order in one day, PaperTrue requested more two days beyond the agreed deadline to finish working on my order! After discussing this frustrating request, they told me that they'll process a 5% refund of my order value within the next 24 - 48 hour, however, they did not fulfil their promise again! In above of this, the editing was not as I expected!
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
One of the editors sounds like a high school student. Messing up my APA format and doesn't sound like she knows what she's doing
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
Direct quote from my supervisor “There were lots of spelling, grammar and syntax that needed adjusting ...”
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
Many errors were not being corrected and I can see very little improvement of my essay. Many informal sentences were kept with no suggestion of what to change.
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
I don't know! PaperTrue is cheap in comparison with other professional editor consultants. I have choosed it because I wanted to give it a try and because I needed proofreading and academic editing. The result makes me say "ok. So?" There are some inaccuracies left regarding quotes in the text, they weren't coherent through the text, and still, they are not. I was expecting annotations on words use and advice for new and appropriate terms, but there are not. The formatting part is perfect. PaperTrue delivered it one day earlier. I don't know if I will use it again.
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
Poor service' promises not kept, time was not time, first proofing & typesetting was a disaster' after going back & forth for a month' still mistakes & a back cover page left out. Anything but professional as they claim to be. Not worth the money!
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
the first review was excellent although it was 10000 words, the second review was horrible although it was only 400 words
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
No improvements made to resume. Reviewer did not understand technical descriptions of employment history and made edits that completely changed the meaning. Reviewer reformatted to use "I am", "I did", and "I have" which are widely documented as bad practices for resume writing. It's would have been better just to state there were no improvements to be made. That would have been satisfactory.
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
Unfortunately I was really disappointed. Every paper (total 4 paper) had different formatting versions and mostly every paper was "destroyed" by incomprehensible actions: Furthermore, paragraph had all the same formatting structures including size and font and was send back with different formatting options... That was really exhausting by the time pressure for the university. Sorry, but a financial approach should be fair. It was not the money worth. Regards, Philipp
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
I still had english grammar mistakes in my paper.Not happy.
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
My sample abstract paragraph was edited - upon letting PT know my request to have scientific/engineering editing background - disrupting technical concepts, changing terms for the sake of change, but not editing the logic flow or consistency. When I sent PT my observations, PT said they would ask a sci editor to redo the assignment; but the re-edited abstract was basically what I had already observed. Your web editing advert is pretty good/powerful and it raised big expectations, but clearly scientific/engineering editing is not within you familiar areas of expertise.
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
Changed the meaning of sentences, modified into incomplete sentences, changed affirmation into questions... Pretty bad for that kind of price, I am disappointed.
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
Absolutely terrible, its not dependable and has a lot of mistakes. I have submitted my thesis for proofreading before submitting it for uni and paid a fair amount for this service. while the author has fixed many mistakes, However, the author has delivered the work unfinished and has asked me on many occasions where he fixed one mistake and asked me to fix the similar ones myself myself, which I found was extremely rude as if I was going to do it myself I wouldn't have paid this amount. also he did not put the bibliography in an alphabetical order which is a minimum requirement. totally not worth the money
Helpful Report
Posted 5 years ago
PaperTrue is rated 4.6 based on 2,377 reviews