“Our trainer, Nick, took every opportunity to enliven the material with credible examples from his own experience which made the course much more engaging.”
“Instructor (Rosemary) was terrific, so knowledgable on the curriculum, personable and professional. Facility was easy to get to and comfortable, with lots of tea and biscuits to keep us going.”
“The overall course was well conducted with some real life examples, would be even better if we can have some practical sessions with scenarios provided for the team to resolve.”
“It was a very good training, the Trainer has a good skill of the topics and very well explained.
Good labs.
The training in my opinion is a little bit short to coverage all the Aruba topics, and we don't have much time to complete the hard labs.
It is a good idea to leave open the labs one or more days to practice again all the labs.
Thanks”
“The course was longer than was necessary for the level of knowledge required. As an attend from anywhere candidate, I found the sound quality to be a major issue and would suggest candidates go for the classroom sessions if possible.”
“I attended parts 1 and 2 of AUCCE, unfortunately I have my material in 2 different formats, I have part 1 in Cisco Box form and part 2 on online form, would have been nice for my Part 1 to be online or vice versa.”
“On Monday afternoon at around 4pm I found that I could not complete the lab and by around 5pm it was discovered that my lab setup was broken.
On Tuesday morning this was fixed but again at around 4.30pm I found a similar issue and could not complete another lab.
On Wednesday morning this was fixed it seemed and I continued all day until around 4.30pm when I found that the routing setup on my lab was faulty or non-existent so I could not complete that lab.
On Thursday morning this problem was still present so I could only do parts of the lab which did not require branch site routing which was only fixed after Thursday lunchtime.
Hardware requirements for remote access attendees should state at least two monitors preferably three as I found it difficult with two and it would have been impossible with just one screen.
Too many documents need to be accessed at the same time. The Discoveries and Labs should all be in the same document as they are essentially the same. The discoveries are not numbered and are difficult at best to find when you need to do them at the end of each presentation section.
The differences between the local setup and the Cisco documentation were confusing and again required juggling other documents to see what differed.”
“Barry was great, very engaging. I found the course really useful, particularly working with people from different areas of Three.
Also, the Global Knowledge offices and facilities are really good.”
“Studying the CompTIA Network + course. For the amount of money paid, I am disappointed that we did not complete the course. I bought the book and at the start of the course I asked the instructor what parts do we not need to know. He replied we need to study all of the contents of the book. The 4 day course only covered 12 chapters of the 20 chapters in the book. So we only really covered two thirds of the course!”
“GK facilitated the training(s) very well, provided a sufficient lunch and good-excellent facilities and classrooms. Trainer was knowledgeable and enthusiastic.
Coffee could improve. Cookies sometimes ran out. ;-)”
“I thought the Instructor was excellent, very knowledgeable and made the course both interesting and entertaining. The course material however was non existent for me, I was send an email with a link to download the book, however our infrastructure would not allow us to do that, hence no course material as no hard copy was provided, and there were no hand outs. I found this very disappointing.”
“The amount content covered was poor. I feel like this would have been different if my teacher had not gone off course so often and for so long. But what I did learn was good.”
